Allergology International · 2018 · 26 citations · 19 references
Life SciencesDermatologyAllergyHypersensitivityThermal AnalysisAllergic Skin DiseasesContact AllergyContact DermatitisPatch TestingSkin AssessmentSkin IrritationContact AllergensInfrared ThermographyInfrared ThermometryPatch Test ReadingsSkin Temperature MeasurementThermal Infrared ImagingThermal Infrared RadiationThermography
BACKGROUND: Patch testing of contact allergens to diagnose allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is a traditional, useful tool. The most important decision is the distinction between allergic and irritant reactions, as this has direct implications on diagnosis and management. Our objective was to evaluate a new method of non-contact infrared reading of patch tests. Secondary objectives included a possible correlation between the intensity of the patch test reaction and temperature change. METHODS: 420 positive reactions from patients were included in our study. An independent patch test reader assessed the positive reactions and classified them as allergic (of intensity + to +++) or irritant (IR). At the same time, a forward-looking infrared (FLIR) camera attachment for an iPhone was used to acquire infrared thermal images of the patch tests, and images were analyzed using the FLIR ONE app. RESULTS: Allergic patch test reactions were characterized by temperature increases of 0.72 ± 0.67 °C compared to surrounding skin. Irritant reactions only resulted in 0.17 ± 0.31 °C temperature increase. The mean temperature difference between the two groups was highly significant (p < 0.0001) and therefore was used to predict the type of contact dermatitis. CONCLUSIONS: Thermography is a reliable and effective way to distinguish between allergic and irritant contact dermatitis.
19
Building Predictive Models in R Using the caret Package
Experiment with a new boosting algorithm
Yoav Freund · Medical Entomology and Zoology · 1996 · 487 citations