Cancer · 2018 · 82 citations · 37 references
MedicineOncologyPharmacologyMedical OncologyMolecular OncologyThoracic OncologyCancer ImmunotherapyLung CancerOncogene ActivationOncogene MutationsNon-small Cell Lung Cancer TherapyOncogenic Driver MutationsPositive Predictive ValueProgrammed Cell Death Protein 1 InhibitorsProgrammed Death-1 InhibitionProgrammed Death-ligand 1 BiomarkerProgrammed Death-ligand 1 InhibitionSmoking Status Rating
BACKGROUND: This multicenter, retrospective study explored the value of oncogene driver subtype, programmed death-1 ligand (PD-L1) status, and smoking status for predicting which patients with oncogene-driven non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) would benefit from treatment with programmed death-1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 inhibitors. METHODS: The clinical features, PD-L1 tumor proportion scores, and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor (PDi) outcomes (objective response rate and progression-free survival) of patients who had advanced NSCLC with Kirsten rat sarcoma 2 viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutations or common, actionable oncogenic drivers were captured. RESULTS: In total, 189 oncogene-positive patients were analyzed. Of these, 104 received a PDi, and 108 had undergone prior PD-L1 testing. The frequency of PD-L1 positivity (≥1%) was higher in patients who had KRAS mutations (P = .031), smokers (P = .006), and non-Asian patients (P = .002). Multivariable analysis indicated that smoking status (P < .001) was the only factor associated significantly with KRAS mutation. The objective response rate to PDi treatment was 16.9% (11 of 65 patients) among smokers (17.3% in the KRAS-mutant and 15.4% in the non-KRAS-mutant smoker subgroups), which was significantly higher than the 0% rate (0 of 26 patients; P = .019) among never-smokers. In subgroup analyses, progression-free survival was influenced by KRAS mutation status (median, 4.57 vs 1.63 months; P = .004), smoking status (4.07 vs 1.73 months; P = .004), PD-L1 positivity (3.8 vs 1.2 months; P = .040), and non-Asian race (3.0 vs 1.97 months; P = .046). In multivariable analysis, only smoking status (P = .008) remained a significant predictor when a PD-L1 level ≥1% was used. However, both smoking status (P = .001) and PD-L1 status (P = .028) were independent predictors when a PD-L1 level ≥50% was used. CONCLUSIONS: Among associated clinical features among patients who have NSCLC with oncogenic drivers, smoking status potentially was the most important, easily available predictor of single PDi efficacy.
37
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
E. Eisenhauer, P. Therasse, Jan Bogaerts et al. · European Journal of Cancer · 2008 · 29.5K citations
Pembrolizumab versus Chemotherapy for PD-L1–Positive Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Martin Reck, Delvys Rodríguez‐Abreu, Andrew Robinson et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2016 · 10.1K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +17
Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
H. Borghaei, L. Paz-Ares, Leora Horn et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2015 · 9.5K citations · Full text
Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Squamous-Cell Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Julie R. Brahmer, Karen L. Reckamp, Lucio Crinò et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2015 · 8.6K citations · Full text
Pharmacy, Oncology, Pharmacotherapy +15
Gefitinib or Carboplatin–Paclitaxel in Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma
Tony Mok, Yi‐Long Wu, Sumitra Thongprasert et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2009 · 8.2K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +13