PLoS ONE · 2018 · 21 citations · 22 references
MedicineNuclear MedicineRadiologyDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic RadiologyOncologic ImagingImage Quality AssessmentMagnetic Resonance ImagingMedical ImagingOncologic Hybrid ImagingPositron Emission Tomography18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Imaging18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission TomographyClinical Image QualityImage Acquisition QualityLesion DetectionPet Image ReconstructionSignal-to-noise RatioWhole-body Magnetic Resonance Imaging
PURPOSE: The trend towards faster acquisition protocols in whole-body positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance (PET/MR) arises the question of whether short PET data acquisition protocols in a whole-body multi-station context allow for reduced PET acquisition times while providing adequate PET image quality and accurate quantification parameters. The study goal is to investigate how reducing PET acquisition times affects PET image quality and quantification in whole-body PET/MR in patients with oncologic findings. METHODS: Fifty-one patients with different oncologic findings underwent a clinical whole-body 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/MR examination. PET data was reconstructed with 4, 3, 2, and 1 min/bed time intervals for each patient to simulate the effect of reduced PET acquisition times. The 4-minute PET reconstructions served as reference standard. All whole-body PET data sets were analyzed regarding image quality, lesion detectability, PET quantification and standardized uptake values. RESULTS: A total of 91 lesions were detected in the 4-minute PET reconstructions. The same number of congruent lesions was also noticed in the 3 and 2 minutes-per-bed (mpb) reconstructed images. A total of 2 lesions in 2 patients was not detected in the 1 minute PET data reconstructions due to poor image quality. Image noise in the blood pool increased from 22.2% (4 mpb) to 42.1% (1 mpb). Signal-to-noise ratio declined with shorter timeframes from 13.1 (4 mpb) to 9.3 (1 mpb). SUVmean and SUVmax showed no significant changes between 4 and 1 mpb reconstructed timeframes. CONCLUSIONS: Reconstruction of PET data with different time intervals has shown that 2 minutes acquisition time per bed position instead of 4 minutes is sufficient to provide accurate lesion detection and adequate image quality in a clinical setting, despite the trends to lower image quality with shorter PET acquisition times. This provides latitude for potential reduction of PET acquisition times in fast PET/MR whole-body examinations.
22
Attenuation correction for a combined 3D PET/CT scanner
Paul E. Kinahan, D.W. Townsend, Thomas Beyer et al. · Medical Physics · 1998 · 933 citations
Performance Measurements of the Siemens mMR Integrated Whole-Body PET/MR Scanner
Gaspar Delso, Sebastian Fürst, Björn Jakoby et al. · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · 2011 · 876 citations · Full text
Design and performance evaluation of a whole-body Ingenuity TF PET–MRI system
Habib Zaidi, N Ojha, Michael Morich et al. · Physics in Medicine and Biology · 2011 · 398 citations · Full text