JSLS Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons · 2018 · 17 citations · 18 references
MedicineGynecologySurgeryGeneral SurgeryPerioperative SafetyReproductive SurgeryLaparoscopic SurgerySurgical ComplicationsSurgical Resource UtilizationCohort Study InvestigationHospital Readmission RatesHospital Stay DurationLaparoscopic HysterectomyLaparoscopic SalpingectomyLaparoscopic-assisted SurgeryOperating Room Time UtilizationSurgical Approach Comparison
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study analyzed the trends of opportunistic salpingectomy (OS) accompanied by hysterectomy in a 9-year follow-up period at a single institute. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 1184 women at Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital from 2007 to 2015 who underwent hysterectomy performed with or without OS. Parameters including patient age, operating time, surgical approach, length of hospital stay, and perioperative complications were evaluated. RESULTS: < .001) over the study period. Minimal additional operating time was necessary for hysterectomy with OS (3.7 and 3.6 minutes in open and laparoscopic surgery, respectively). No significant differences were observed in the risks of hospital readmission or blood transfusions between women who underwent hysterectomy with OS performed with the open approach and those who underwent the procedure using the laparoscopic approach. From 2007 to 2015, the proportion of open hysterectomies decreased from 56% to 6%. CONCLUSION: The results of this 9-year follow-up study revealed that, as a cancer prevention method, OS seems to be feasible and safe, requires minimal extra time, and does not increase the morbidity or long-term sequelae.
18
Rebecca L. Siegel, Elizabeth Ward, Otis W. Brawley et al. · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · 2011 · 4.1K citations · Full text
Cecilie Maria Madsen, Louise Baandrup, Christian Dehlendorff et al. · Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica · 2014 · 212 citations · Full text
Medicine, Gynecology, Surgery +17