American Economic Journal Economic Policy · 2020 · 79 citations · 26 references
EducationEducational MeasurementHigher EducationCausal InferenceSocial InequalityStatisticsAdmissions AnalyticsAdmissions TestingSelection BiasStudent Demographics AnalysisStudent Enrollment AnalysisTest BiasCollege Enrollment EffectsEnrollment InequalityFour-year Graduation RateLeft-digit EffectLow IncomeStudent Achievement GapStudent Attainment GapsUnderrepresented Populations
Only half of SAT-takers retake the exam, with even lower retake rates among low-income students and underrepresented minority (URM) students. We exploit discontinuous jumps in retake probabilities at multiples of 100, driven by left-digit bias, to estimate retaking’s causal effects. Retaking substantially improves SAT scores and increases four-year college enrollment rates, particularly for low-income and URM students. Eliminating disparities in retake rates could close up to 10 percent of the income-based gap and up to 7 percent of the race-based gap in four-year college enrollment rates of high school graduates. (JEL I21, I23, I24, J15)
26
Instrumental Variables Regression with Weak Instruments
Douglas O. Staiger, James H. Stock · Econometrica · 1997 · 7.3K citations
Behavioral Economics and Public Policy: A Pragmatic Perspective
Raj Chetty · American Economic Review · 2015 · 453 citations