Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2018 · 36 citations · 31 references
PharmacyPharmacoeconomicsPreventive MedicineCost-effectiveness AnalysisHiv PreventionPharmacoeconomic ModelingCost-effectiveness ModelingHiv EpidemiologyPre-exposure ProphylaxisPrevention Of Sexual TransmissionSexual HealthSexually Transmitted Infection PreventionAntiretroviral Therapy CoverageEstimated CostsHiv Pre-exposure ProphylaxisHiv Preexposure ProphylaxisPre-exposure Prophylaxis Cost-effectivenessPre-exposure Prophylaxis ImplementationPre-exposure Prophylaxis UptakeUnit Cost Estimating
INTRODUCTION: In 2014, the Government of Thailand recommended pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) as an additional HIV prevention programme within Thailand's National Guidelines on HIV/AIDS Treatment Prevention. However, to date implementation and uptake of PrEP programmes have been limited, and evidence on the costs and the epidemiological and economic impact is not available. METHODS: We estimated the costs associated with PrEP provision among men having sex with men (MSM) participating in a facility-based, prospective observational cohort study: the Test, Treat and Prevent HIV Programme in Thailand. We created a suite of scenarios to estimate the cost-effectiveness of PrEP and sensitivity of the results to the model input parameters, including PrEP programme effectiveness, PrEP uptake among high-risk and low-risk MSM, baseline and future antiretroviral therapy (ART) coverage, condom use, unit cost of delivering PrEP, and the discount rate. RESULTS: Drug costs accounted for 82.5% of the total cost of providing PrEP, followed by lab testing (8.2%) and personnel costs (7.8%). The estimated costs of providing the PrEP package in accordance with the national recommendation ranges from US$223 to US$311 per person per year. Based on our modelling results, we estimate that PrEP would be cost-effective when provided to either high-risk or all MSM. However, we found that the programme would be approximately 32% more cost-effective if offered to high-risk MSM than it would be if offered to all MSM, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of US$4,836 per disability-adjusted life years (DALY) averted and US$7,089 per DALY averted respectively. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves demonstrate that 80% of scenarios would be cost-effective when PrEP is provided solely to higher-risk MSM. CONCLUSION: We provide the first estimates on cost and cost-effectiveness of PrEP in the Asia-Pacific region, and offer insights on how to deliver PrEP in combination with ART. While the high drug cost poses a budgeting challenge, incorporating PrEP delivery into an existing ART programme could be a cost-effective strategy to prevent HIV infections among MSM in Thailand.
31
Kachit Choopanya, Michael Martin, Pravan Suntharasamai et al. · The Lancet · 2013 · 1.5K citations
Public Health, Infectious Disease Control, Pharmacotherapy +8
Frits van Griensven, Anchalee Varangrat, Wipas Wimonsate et al. · JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes · 2010 · 164 citations
Public Health, Infectious Disease Control, Preventive Medicine +17