A randomised controlled trial of an Intervention to Improve Compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines (IICARus)

Kaitlyn Hair, Malcolm Macleod, David W. Howells, Philip M. Bath, Catriona MacCallum, Gavin Morrison, Alejandra Clark, Gina M. Alvino, Michelle T. Dohm, Jing Liao,

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2018 · 23 citations · 14 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

Abstract

Abstract The ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) guidelines are widely endorsed but compliance is limited. We sought to determine whether journal-requested completion of an ARRIVE checklist improves full compliance with the guidelines. In a randomised controlled trial, manuscripts reporting in vivo animal research submitted to PLOS ONE (March-June 2015) were allocated to either requested completion of an ARRIVE checklist or current standard practice. We measured the change in proportion of manuscripts meeting all ARRIVE guideline checklist items between groups. We randomised 1,689 manuscripts, 1,269 were sent for peer review and 762 accepted for publication. The request to complete an ARRIVE checklist had no effect on full compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines. Details of animal husbandry (ARRIVE sub-item 9a) was the only item to show improved reporting, from 52.1% to 74.1% (X 2 =34.0, df=1, p=2.1×10 −7 ). These results suggest that other approaches are required to secure greater implementation of the ARRIVE guidelines.

References

14