Journal of Political Marketing · 2018 · 45 citations · 89 references
Public AffairsPolitical CommunicationPolitical ScienceAmerican PoliticsElection CommunicationPublic OpinionBiasDisinformationElection FraudFraud DetectionSource CredibilityDead Voter FraudDisinformation CorrectionsEndorsement MisrepresentationFact-checking EffectsFact-checking In Election ReportingMisinformation In ElectionsPolitical DeceptionVote Fraud Remedies
The 2016 US Presidential election was unique for many reasons, especially the widespread endorsement of falsehoods about the candidates and the electoral process. Using a unique experiment fielded the week prior to the election, we examine whether correcting information can overcome misperceptions about election fraud. We find that providing counter information is generally ineffective at remedying misperceptions and can, depending on the source, increase endorsements of misperceptions among Republicans. Although information from a fact-checking source is generally unconvincing, when given with evidence from an unlikely source – in our experiment, Breitbart News – both Republicans and Democrats decrease beliefs in voter fraud.
89
Michael D. Buhrmester, Tracy Kwang, Samuel D. Gosling · Perspectives on Psychological Science · 2011 · 10.1K citations