Scientific Reports · 2018 · 135 citations · 73 references
Natural SciencesMaterials EngineeringMaterials ScienceInorganic ChemistryMaterials ChemistryNanomaterialsIron OxidesMetal Oxide NanomaterialsNanocatalysisNanocompositesPerovskite MaterialsPhotocatalysisDye DegradationGraphene OxideHydrogen ProductionNanostructured PhotocatalystsPhase SelectionPhotocatalytic DegradationPhotocatalytic NanomaterialsReduced Graphene Oxide
Abstract A comprehensive comparison between BiFeO 3 -reduced graphene oxide (rGO) nanocomposite and Bi 25 FeO 40 -rGO nanocomposite has been performed to investigate their photocatalytic abilities in degradation of Rhodamine B dye and generation of hydrogen by water-splitting. The hydrothermal technique adapted for synthesis of the nanocomposites provides a versatile temperature-controlled phase selection between perovskite BiFeO 3 and sillenite Bi 25 FeO 40 . Both perovskite and sillenite structured nanocomposites are stable and exhibit considerably higher photocatalytic ability over pure BiFeO 3 nanoparticles and commercially available Degussa P25 titania. Notably, Bi 25 FeO 40 -rGO nanocomposite has demonstrated superior photocatalytic ability and stability under visible light irradiation than that of BiFeO 3 -rGO nanocomposite. The possible mechanism behind the superior photocatalytic performance of Bi 25 FeO 40 -rGO nanocomposite has been critically discussed.
73
A. K. Geǐm, Kostya S. Novoselov · Nature Materials · 2007 · 39.5K citations
Graphene: Status and Prospects
A. K. Geǐm · Science · 2009 · 13.9K citations · Full text
The reduction of graphene oxide
Songfeng Pei, Hui–Ming Cheng · Carbon · 2011 · 5.1K citations
Natural Sciences, Materials Engineering, Materials Science +10