Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology · 2018 · 56 citations · 14 references
PharmacyOncologyPharmacologyCancer PharmacologyOncology PharmacotherapyPharmacokinetics Of Anticancer AgentsDose EscalationDose SchedulingPharmacokinetics Of Anticancer DrugsPharmacokinetics Of Monoclonal AntibodiesTargeted Cancer TherapyTargeted TherapyBispecific Antibody CombinationsBispecific Antibody ConjugatesBispecific Antibody FragmentsDose Escalation Toxicity AssessmentEgfr InhibitionEpidermal Growth Factor Receptor InhibitionRecommended Phase Ii DoseTargeted Therapy Toxicity
PURPOSE: The phase I study characterized the safety, pharmacokinetics, anti-tumor activity, and recommended phase II dose/schedule of LY3164530 in patients with advanced or metastatic cancer. METHODS: Patients received LY3164530 on days 1 and 15 (Schedule 1: 300, 600, 1000, and 1250 mg) or Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (Schedule 2: 500 and 600 mg) of each 28 days cycle. Dose escalation used a modified toxicity probability interval model. RESULTS: Dose escalation defined a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 1000 mg on Schedule 1 and 500 mg on Schedule 2. Treatment-emergent adverse events related to study treatment were consistent with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibition and included maculopapular rash/dermatitis acneiform (83%, Grade 3/4 17%), hypomagnesemia (55%, Grade 3/4 7%), paronychia (35%), fatigue (28%, Grade 3/4 3%), skin fissures (24%), and hypokalemia (21%, Grade 3/4 7%). Partial response was achieved in three patients on Schedule 2 with colorectal cancer (n = 2) or squamous cell cancer. Overall response rate (ORR) was 10.3%, disease control rate (ORR + stable disease [SD]) was 51.7 and 17.2% of patients had SD ≥ 4 months. The in vivo stability of the bispecific antibody was confirmed. Schedule 2 provided greater and more consistent inhibition of mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET)/EGFR throughout the dosing interval than Schedule 1. CONCLUSIONS: Although this study defined the LY3164530 MTD and pharmacokinetics on both schedules, significant toxicities associated with EGFR inhibition and lack of a potential predictive biomarker limit future development. Nonetheless, the results provide insight into the development of bispecific antibody therapy.
14
Seiji Yano, Tadaaki Yamada, Shinji Takeuchi et al. · Journal of Thoracic Oncology · 2011 · 217 citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +17
Ultan McDermott, Raju V. Pusapati, James G. Christensen et al. · Cancer Research · 2010 · 159 citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +16