Publication | Closed Access
Multi-tenant GPU Clusters for Deep Learning Workloads: Analysis and Implications
43
Citations
35
References
2018
Year
Unknown Venue
Multi-tenant Gpu ClustersCluster ComputingEngineeringMachine LearningGpu BenchmarkingMachine Learning ToolBig Data AnalyticsComputer ArchitectureGpu ComputingData ScienceEmbedded Machine LearningParallel ComputingBig DataJob SchedulerMassively-parallel ComputingComputer EngineeringDeep Learning FrameworksComputer ScienceDeep LearningGpu ClusterData-intensive ComputingGpu ArchitectureEdge ComputingCloud ComputingParallel ProgrammingWorkload Perspective
With widespread advances in machine learning, a number of large enterprises are beginning to incorporate machine learning models across a number of products. These models are typically trained on shared, multi-tenant GPU clusters. Similar to existing cluster computing workloads, scheduling frameworks aim to provide features like high efficiency, resource isolation, fair sharing across users, etc. However Deep Neural Network (DNN) based workloads, predominantly trained on GPUs, differ in two significant ways from traditional big data analytics workloads. First, from a cluster utilization perspective, GPUs represent a monolithic resource that cannot be shared at a fine granularity across users. Second, from a workload perspective, deep learning frameworks require gang scheduling reducing the flexibility of scheduling and making the jobs themselves inelastic to failures at runtime. In this paper we present a detailed workload characterization of a two-month long trace from a multi-tenant GPU cluster in a large enterprise. By correlating scheduler logs with logs from individual jobs, we study three distinct issues that affect cluster utilization for DNN training workloads on multi-tenant clusters: (1) the effect of gang scheduling and locality constraints on queuing, (2) the effect of locality on GPU utilization, and (3) failures during training. Based on our experience running a large-scale operation, we provide design guidelines pertaining to next-generation cluster schedulers for DNN training workloads.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1