Strength and conditioning journal · 2018 · 46 citations · 47 references
EducationInstructional ModelsExercise PsychologyKinesiologyC PracticeCoachingSkilled PerformanceAbstract Decision-makingSport ScienceHealth SciencesPhysical FitnessConfidence BuildingUnderstanding Contextual ChallengesAthletic TrainingPerformance StudiesHigh-performance SportConditioning CoachingSport PsychologyDecision Science
Decision‑making is a critical determinant of coach expertise and effectiveness. The article introduces a decision‑making framework designed to improve strength and conditioning coaches’ effectiveness. The framework combines athlete‑centric theory (the “who”), training principles and sport demands (the “what”), learning and behavior theories (the “how”), and contextual and self‑factors to guide coaches in planning, delivering, reflecting, and implementing constructively aligned learning programs for professional development.
ABSTRACT DECISION-MAKING IS A KEY FACTOR IN DEVELOPING COACH EXPERTISE AND EFFECTIVENESS. THIS ARTICLE PRESENTS A FRAMEWORK FOR ENHANCING COACH DECISION-MAKING WITHIN STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING (S&C). BASED ON THEORETICAL UNDERSTANDING OF THE ATHLETE (THE “WHO”), S&C TRAINING PRINCIPLES AND SPORT DEMANDS (THE “WHAT”), AND LEARNING THEORIES AND BEHAVIOR (THE “HOW”), COACHES CAN ENHANCE S&C PRACTICE (“PLANNING, DELIVERING, AND REFLECTING”). IN ADDITION, UNDERSTANDING CONTEXTUAL CHALLENGES (“CONTEXT, CULTURE, AND POLITICS”) AND OWN BELIEFS, VALUES, AND BEHAVIORS (“SELF”) MUST BE CONSIDERED. RECOMMENDATIONS ARE PRESENTED FOR IMPLEMENTING CONSTRUCTIVELY ALIGNED LEARNING PROGRAMS BASED ON THE DECISION-MAKING FRAMEWORK FOR ENHANCING COACH LEARNING AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN S&C.
47
Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment
John Biggs · Higher Education · 1996 · 3.6K citations
COGNITIVE APPRENTICESHIP: MAKING THINKING VISIBLE
Allan Collins, John Seely Brown, Ann Holum · 1991 · 1.5K citations