Fusion Engineering and Design · 2018 · 299 citations · 46 references
EngineeringNuclear EngineeringSystems EngineeringFusion EngineeringMachine DesignReactor PhysicsDivertor DesignDivertor EngineeringNuclear FusionReactor Core DesignReactor DesignReactor InstrumentationAdvanced Divertor ConfigurationsAdvanced Reactor ConceptsDesign IntegrationIntegration RisksNuclear Reactor DesignPlant Layout DesignSnowflake Divertor ConfigurationSnowflake Divertors
The paper reports progress of the DEMO Design Activities in Europe, focusing on resolving critical design integration issues that impact machine configuration, plant layout, and system technology selection. Work centers on integrating a pulsed baseline DEMO reactor concept, evaluating alternative configurations such as double‑null, snowflake, and flexible inductively driven designs, and applying a structured down‑selection process to narrow options toward a plant concept that mitigates integration risks and meets stakeholder requirements. Recent technical achievements are highlighted.
This paper describes the progress of the DEMO Design Activities in Europe and particularly the work done to address critical design integration issues that affect the machine configuration and performance, the plant concept layout and the selection of system design and technologies. Work continues to be primarily focused on the design integration of a pulsed baseline DEMO reactor concept, but a number of alternative configurations (e.g., a double-null divertor and a snowflake divertor as well as a ‘flexi’ DEMO that operates initially in an inductively driven pulsed regime, with the possibility to be upgraded to a long-pulse or steady-state machine with a greater reliance on auxiliary current drive, etc.) are under preliminary study, especially to evaluate their DEMO reactor relevance. Some initial considerations are given on the strategy to implement a structured design and technology down-selection, that progressively reviews and narrows options to arrive at the DEMO plant concept that addresses major system integration risks and offers the best probability to satisfy all stakeholder mission requirements. Finally, some recent technical achievements are highlighted.
46
Overview of EU DEMO design and R&D activities
G. Federici, R. Kemp, David J. Ward et al. · Fusion Engineering and Design · 2014 · 314 citations
Objectives and status of EUROfusion DEMO blanket studies
L.V. Boccaccini, G. Aiello, Julien Aubert et al. · Fusion Engineering and Design · 2016 · 205 citations · Full text
“PROCESS”: A systems code for fusion power plants—Part 1: Physics
M. Kovari, R. Kemp, H. Lux et al. · Fusion Engineering and Design · 2014 · 170 citations
Advances in the physics basis for the European DEMO design
R. Wenninger, Frederik Arbeiter, Julien Aubert et al. · Nuclear Fusion · 2015 · 145 citations · Full text