Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · 2018 · 32 citations · 5 references
NursingHealth InformaticsConsumer Health InformaticsHealth Technology AssessmentPatient SafetyBlood Pressure ManagementCardiovascular AssessmentMobile Health ApplicationsBlood PressureHealth App PrivacyRegulatory Safety ReviewStar Rating AnalysisStar Rating SystemsSummary StatisticsUser Reviews
Objective: To understand whether user reviews of Instant Blood Pressure (IBP), an inaccurate, unregulated BP-measuring app reflected IBP's inaccuracy, to understand drivers for high and low ratings, and to understand if disclaimers prevented medical use. Materials and Methods: All iTunes app reviews for IBP v1.2.3 were downloaded and assessed for themes by two reviewers. Summary statistics for themes were tabulated with their associated star ratings. Results: Common themes included perceived accuracy (42% of all reviews, star rating mean 4.8, median 5), inaccuracy (10%, 2.0, 1), and convenience (34%, 4.7, 5). Nine percent documented IBP use in medical conditions (4.6, 5), and 2% mentioned IBP's disclaimer (2.7, 3). Discussion: User reviews and ratings of a popular, inaccurate BP-measuring app were positive and uncommonly commented on its inaccuracy. Disclaimers attempting to prevent medical use of the app were ineffective. These findings support the need for more rigorous regulatory review of apps prior to their release.
5
FDA Regulation of Mobile Health Technologies
Nathan Cortez, I. Glenn Cohen, Aaron S. Kesselheim · New England Journal of Medicine · 2014 · 233 citations · Full text
Nursing, Health Law, Health Policy +10
Validation of the Instant Blood Pressure Smartphone App
Timothy B. Plante, Bruno Urrea, Zane MacFarlane et al. · JAMA Internal Medicine · 2016 · 162 citations · Full text