2019 · 212 citations · 58 references
ComputingComputer ScienceComputer VisionMachine VisionRobot Vision3D ReconstructionDepth EstimationScene ReconstructionScene UnderstandingSelf-supervised LearningStereo VisionCamera Motion EstimationDepth Map EstimationDepth Map ReconstructionImage Formation ModelsMonocular Depth EstimationMulti-scale SamplingSelf-supervised Depth EstimationSelf-training
Ground‑truth depth data are hard to obtain at scale, so self‑supervised learning has become a promising alternative for monocular depth estimation, with recent advances in architectures, loss functions, and image formation models narrowing the gap to fully supervised methods. The paper proposes a set of improvements that yield quantitatively and qualitatively better depth maps than competing self‑supervised methods. The authors introduce a minimum reprojection loss for occlusion robustness, a full‑resolution multi‑scale sampling scheme to reduce artifacts, and an auto‑masking loss that discards pixels violating camera motion assumptions. The improvements produce quantitatively and qualitatively superior depth maps, with a surprisingly simple model yielding state‑of‑the‑art results on the KITTI benchmark, as each component’s effectiveness was demonstrated in isolation.
Per-pixel ground-truth depth data is challenging to acquire at scale. To overcome this limitation, self-supervised learning has emerged as a promising alternative for training models to perform monocular depth estimation. In this paper, we propose a set of improvements, which together result in both quantitatively and qualitatively improved depth maps compared to competing self-supervised methods. Research on self-supervised monocular training usually explores increasingly complex architectures, loss functions, and image formation models, all of which have recently helped to close the gap with fully-supervised methods. We show that a surprisingly simple model, and associated design choices, lead to superior predictions. In particular, we propose (i) a minimum reprojection loss, designed to robustly handle occlusions, (ii) a full-resolution multi-scale sampling method that reduces visual artifacts, and (iii) an auto-masking loss to ignore training pixels that violate camera motion assumptions. We demonstrate the effectiveness of each component in isolation, and show high quality, state-of-the-art results on the KITTI benchmark.
58
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren et al. · 2016 · 222.1K citations · Full text
Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity
Zhou Wang, Alan C. Bovik, Hamid R. Sheikh et al. · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · 2004 · 56K citations
ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge
Olga Russakovsky, Jia Deng, Hao Su et al. · International Journal of Computer Vision · 2015 · 40.2K citations
Rich Feature Hierarchies for Accurate Object Detection and Semantic Segmentation
Ross Girshick, Jeff Donahue, Trevor Darrell et al. · 2014 · 31.8K citations
Are we ready for autonomous driving? The KITTI vision benchmark suite
Andreas Geiger, P Lenz, R. Urtasun · 2012 · 14.4K citations