PLoS ONE · 2018 · 37 citations · 42 references
MedicineOrthopaedic SurgeryOrthopedic SurgeryBiomechanicsOrthopedic BiomechanicsOrthopedicsHip ArthroplastyHip BiomechanicsJoint BiomechanicsJoint MechanicsMusculoskeletal BiomechanicsMusculoskeletal System ModelingHip Joint AnatomyHip Joint MechanicsMuscle Strength ProfilingMusculoskeletal MechanicsMusculoskeletal ModelingPeak Force MeasurementTotal Hip Arthroplasty BiomechanicsTotal Joint Arthroplasty
Validation of musculoskeletal models for application in preoperative planning is still a challenging task. Ideally, the simulation results of a patient-specific musculoskeletal model are compared to corresponding in vivo measurements. Currently, the only possibility to measure in vivo joint forces is to implant an instrumented prosthesis in patients undergoing a total joint replacement. In this study, a musculoskeletal model of the AnyBody Modeling System was adapted patient-specifically and validated against the in vivo hip joint force measurements of ten subjects performing one-leg stance and level walking. The impact of four model parameters was evaluated; hip joint width, muscle strength, muscle recruitment, and type of muscle model. The smallest difference between simulated and in vivo hip joint force was achieved by using the hip joint width measured in computed tomography images, a muscle strength of 90 N/cm2, a third order polynomial muscle recruitment, and a simple muscle model. This parameter combination reached mean deviations between simulation and in vivo measurement during the peak force phase of 12% ± 14% in magnitude and 11° ± 5° in orientation for one-leg stance and 8% ± 6% in magnitude and 10° ± 5° in orientation for level walking.
42
Biomechanics and motor control of human movement
Choice Reviews Online · 1990 · 8.5K citations
Education, Anatomy, Kinesiology +17
Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities
G. Bergmann, Georg Deuretzbacher, Markus O. Heller et al. · Journal of Biomechanics · 2001 · 2.2K citations