Publication | Open Access
Efficient Ground Surface Displacement Monitoring Using Sentinel-1 Data: Integrating Distributed Scatterers (DS) Identified Using Two-Sample t-Test with Persistent Scatterers (PS)
42
Citations
46
References
2018
Year
Earth ObservationEnvironmental MonitoringEngineeringTerrestrial SensingGeophysical Signal ProcessingInterferometric Synthetic Aperture RadarEarth ScienceGeophysicsSurface Deformation MonitoringData ScienceSubsidence MonitoringImaging RadarRadar Signal ProcessingPublic HealthSatellite ImagingGeodesySynthetic Aperture RadarPersistent ScatterersGeographyRadar ApplicationEarth Observation DataSignal ProcessingSar DataRadarSeismologyRemote SensingRadar Image ProcessingSpatial Statistics
Combining persistent scatterers (PS) and distributed scatterers (DS) is important for effective displacement monitoring using time-series of SAR data. However, for large stacks of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data, the DS analysis using existing algorithms becomes a time-consuming process. Moreover, the whole procedure of DS selection should be repeated as soon as a new SAR acquisition is made, which is challenging considering the short repeat-observation of missions such as Sentinel-1. SqueeSAR is an approach for extracting signals from DS, which first applies a spatiotemporal filter on images and optimizes DS, then incorporates information from both optimized DS and PS points into interferometric SAR (InSAR) time-series analysis. In this study, we followed SqueeSAR and implemented a new approach for DS analysis using two-sample t-test to efficiently identify neighboring pixels with similar behaviour. We evaluated the performance of our approach on 50 Sentinel-1 images acquired over Trondheim in Norway between January 2015 and December 2016. A cross check on the number of the identified neighboring pixels using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov (KS) test, which is employed in the SqueeSAR approach, and the t-test shows that their results are strongly correlated. However, in comparison to KS-test, the t-test is less computationally intensive (98% faster). Moreover, the results obtained by applying the tests under different SAR stack sizes from 40 to 10 show that the t-test is less sensitive to the number of images.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1