Clinical Cancer Research · 2018 · 44 citations · 26 references
MedicineOncologySurgeryBreast OncologySurgical OncologyTumor ProgressionBreast Cancer RecurrenceBreast PathologyBreast SurgeryBreast-conserving TherapyDuctal Carcinoma In SituBreast Cancer HistopathologyBreast Cancer PrognosisCase-control Study DesignHer2 ExpressionLogistic RegressionLogistic Regression AnalysisNested Case-control DesignRecurrence After Breast-conserving Surgery
Abstract Purpose: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is treated to prevent progression to invasive breast cancer. Yet, most lesions will never progress, implying that overtreatment exists. Therefore, we aimed to identify factors distinguishing harmless from potentially hazardous DCIS using a nested case–control study. Experimental Design: We conducted a case–control study nested in a population-based cohort of patients with DCIS treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) alone (N = 2,658) between 1989 and 2005. We compared clinical, pathologic, and IHC DCIS characteristics of 200 women who subsequently developed ipsilateral invasive breast cancer (iIBC; cases) and 474 women who did not (controls), in a matched setting. Median follow-up time was 12.0 years (interquartile range, 9.0–15.3). Conditional logistic regression models were used to assess associations of various factors with subsequent iIBC risk after primary DCIS. Results: High COX-2 protein expression showed the strongest association with subsequent iIBC [OR = 2.97; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.72–5.10]. In addition, HER2 overexpression (OR = 1.56; 95% CI, 1.05–2.31) and presence of periductal fibrosis (OR = 1.44; 95% CI, 1.01–2.06) were associated with subsequent iIBC risk. Patients with HER2+/COX-2high DCIS had a 4-fold higher risk of subsequent iIBC (vs. HER2−/COX-2low DCIS), and an estimated 22.8% cumulative risk of developing subsequent iIBC at 15 years. Conclusions: With this unbiased study design and representative group of patients with DCIS treated by BCS alone, COX-2, HER2, and periductal fibrosis were revealed as promising markers predicting progression of DCIS into iIBC. Validation will be done in independent datasets. Ultimately, this will aid individual risk stratification of women with primary DCIS. Clin Cancer Res; 24(15); 3593–601. ©2018 AACR.
26
SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2003
Lynn A. G. Ries, D. Harkins, Martin Krapcho et al. · ScholarWorks - Georgia State University (Georgia State University) · 2006 · 11.5K citations · Full text
Medicine, Biostatistics, Oncology +12
Irene Wapnir, James J. Dignam, Bernard Fisher et al. · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2011 · 780 citations · Full text
Breast Cancer Mortality After a Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
Steven A. Narod, Javaid Iqbal, Vasily Giannakeas et al. · JAMA Oncology · 2015 · 622 citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Breast Oncology +14
Cancer Survival Corrected for Heterogeneity in Patient Withdrawal
Timo Hakulinen · Biometrics · 1982 · 455 citations