Publication | Closed Access
Women with inflammatory bowel diseases have a suboptimal cervical cancer screening rate and are not aware of the recommended human papilloma virus vaccine
12
Citations
14
References
2018
Year
Suboptimal Cervical CancerGynecologyVaccine HesitancyGynecology OncologyInflammatory Bowel DiseasesIbd PatientsCervical Cancer PreventionCancer-associated VirusIbd PatientCancer DetectionHuman Papillomavirus VaccinesCervical Cancer Program ManagementClinical EpidemiologyPatient-reported OutcomePublic HealthCervical HealthMedicineOutcomes ResearchScreening SafetyEpidemiologyVaccinationCervical Cancer ManagementCervical Cancer ScreeningCervical CancerCancer ScreeningVaccine EfficacyOncology
The aim of the study was to assess the self-reported cervical cancer screening rate among patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) and patient attitude towards human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccination. A self-designed survey was conducted in hospitalized IBD patients. The survey comprised demographic data, questions regarding cervical smear test frequency and vaccinations recommended for an IBD patient. Randomly, patients completed the survey with a physician present to determine question comprehension. In order to provide test-retest reliability a group of 10 patients completed it twice. Survey data from 150 IBD patients (mean age: 36 years, SD ± 13; mean IBD duration: 10 years, SD ± 6.5) were analyzed. Fifteen percent of the patients reported irregular cervical testing and 15% do not remember when having had a previous cervical testing performed. Only 69% of the patients undergo testing regularly; 30% annually, 32% every 2-3 years; 7% every 5 years. The mean age of patients tested regularly was 22 years, vs. 32 years tested irregularly (p < .001). Only 10% of women claimed that HPV vaccine is recommended for an IBD patient. There is a low adherence to the recommendations regarding cervical cancer screening and prophylaxis. Better multi-disciplinary cooperation between patients and physicians is required to improve patient education and outcomes.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1