GRADE Guidelines: 19. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences—Risk of bias and indirectness

GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations

Gordon Guyatt, Andrew D Oxman, Gunn Elisabeth Vist et al. · BMJ · 2008 · 22.1K citations · Full text

Education, Educational Assessment, Evidence-based Practice +8

GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables

Gordon Guyatt, Andrew D Oxman, Elie A. Akl et al. · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2011 · 10.5K citations

Education, Educational Assessment, Risk Assessment +5

Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations

David C. Atkins, Dana Best, Peter A. Briss et al. · BMJ · 2004 · 8.5K citations · Full text

Nursing, Quality Management, Evidence-based Practice +10

GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence

Howard Balshem, Mark Helfand, Holger J. Schünemann et al. · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2011 · 8.2K citations

Education, Educational Assessment, Evidence-based Practice +10

GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias)

Gordon Guyatt, Andrew D Oxman, Gunn Elisabeth Vist et al. · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2011 · 2.8K citations

Nursing, Medical Education, Evidence-based Practice +13