Dental Materials Journal · 2018 · 149 citations · 30 references
DentistryBioengineeringBiomedical EngineeringBiocompatibilityBiomaterialsMechanical Properties Of Dental MaterialsBiocompatibility Of Dental MaterialsBiocompatibility Of Prosthetic MaterialsDental BiomaterialsDental PolymersMaterials For Maxillofacial ProsthesesProsthetic MaterialsBiocompatibility TestingBone Mechanical PropertiesCad And Cam Dental MaterialsCad ProsthesesPolymethyl MethacrylateRemovable Full-arch ProsthesesResin-based Dental MaterialsSurface Roughness Parameters
This study compared the biocompatibility, mechanical properties, and surface roughness of a pre-polymerized polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) resin for CAD/CAM complete removable dental prostheses (CRDPs) and a traditional heat-polymerized PMMA resin. Two groups of resin substrates [Control (RC): conventional PMMA; Test (RA): CAD/CAM PMMA] were fabricated. Human primary osteoblasts and mouse embryonic-fibroblasts were cultured for biocompatibility assays. Mechanical properties and surface roughness were compared. ANOVA revealed no difference between the resin groups in the biocompatibility assays. RA demonstrated a higher elastic modulus (p=0.002), young's modulus (p=0.002), plastic energy (p=0.002), ultimate strength (p=0.0004), yield point (p=0.016), strain at yield point (p=0.037), and toughness (p<0.0001); while RC displayed a higher elastic energy (p<0.0001). Laser profilometry concluded a rougher surface profile (p<0.0001) for RA. This study concluded that the tested CAD/CAM resin was equally biocompatible and presented with improved mechanical properties than the traditional heat-polymerized PMMA resin used in the fabrication of CRDPs.
30
W. C. Oliver, George M. Pharr · Journal of materials research/Pratt's guide to venture capital sources · 1992 · 26.6K citations
Natural Sciences, Materials Engineering, Materials Science +16
Mathew T. Kattadiyil, Rami Jekki, Charles J. Goodacre et al. · Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry · 2015 · 276 citations