Socio-Economic Review · 2017 · 110 citations · 56 references
Public AffairsCorporate GovernanceCorporate AccountabilityGlobal GovernanceTransnational GovernanceAccountabilityTransnational Labour StandardsCorporate Accountability Across BordersGlobal Labour GovernanceGovernance Of Modern SlaveryRegulation Of Transnational CorporationsTransnational Labour Regulation
In the past decade, corporate accountability for labour standards in global supply chains has risen in transnational governance, prompting societal coalitions to pressure states to enact domestic legislation such as the UK’s 2015 Modern Slavery Act, and understanding industry actors’ use of strategies clarifies how these transnational norms are contested and shaped domestically. The article examines the regulatory processes that led to the passage of the UK’s 2015 Modern Slavery Act. The study confirms that businesses oppose new labour‑standard legislation but also shows that industry actors influence policymaking by championing weak regulatory initiatives, engaging in CSR, and partnering with civil society, thereby shaping anti‑slavery norms.
Abstract Over the last decade, the norm of corporate accountability for labour standards in global supply chains has become increasingly prominent within the transnational governance arena. As global governance initiatives to spur due diligence for labour standards and combat exploitation in global supply chains—especially its most severe forms frequently described as modern slavery—have proliferated, societal coalitions have pressured states to pass domestic legislation to the same effect. In this article, we examine the regulatory processes that spurred the passage of one piece of anti-slavery legislation, the UK’s 2015 Modern Slavery Act. Our findings corroborate a number of established expectations regarding business opposition towards new legislation to raise public labour standards, but also provide a clearer picture of the mechanisms through which industry actors impact policymaking processes. Paradoxically, such mechanisms include business actors’ championing of weak regulatory initiatives, CSR activity and partnering with civil society organizations. Understanding industry actors’ use of these strategies improves our understanding of how transnational norms of corporate accountability and anti-slavery are being contested and shaped at domestic scales.
56