Clinical Infectious Diseases · 2017 · 180 citations · 28 references
Veterinary MedicineInfectious DiseasesInternal MedicineCritical Care MedicineSepsisClinical Recognition Of SepsisGuideline ImplementationSepsis DiagnosisSepsis ManagementSepsis PathophysiologySeptic ShockClinical Criteria For SepsisSepsis Care PathwaysSepsis Empiric TherapySepsis In Intensive CareSeptic Shock ManagementSeptic Shock RecognitionSurviving Sepsis Guideline Adherence
IDSA did not endorse the 2016 Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines despite being represented in the working group that drafted the guidelines document. Leadership from the IDSA, the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines, and the Society of Critical Care Medicine had numerous amicable discussions primarily regarding the bolded, rated guidelines recommendations. Our societies had different perspectives, however, regarding the interpretation of the major studies that informed the guidelines' recommendations, thus leading us to different conclusions and different perspectives on the recommendations. IDSA consequently elected not to endorse the guidelines. IDSA nonetheless hopes to be able to continue collaborating with the Surviving Sepsis Campaign and the Society of Critical Care Medicine to resolve our differences and to develop further strategies together to prevent sepsis and septic shock as well as reduce death and disability from these conditions both nationally and globally.
28
Anand Kumar, Daniel Roberts, Kenneth E. Wood et al. · Critical Care Medicine · 2006 · 6.1K citations
Veterinary Medicine, Infectious Diseases, Antimicrobial Pharmacotherapy +13
André C. Kalil, Mark L. Metersky, Michael Klompas et al. · Clinical Infectious Diseases · 2016 · 3.9K citations · Full text