Journal of Proteome Research · 2017 · 247 citations · 47 references
Life SciencesBiochemistryOncologyMachine LearningMetabolomicsPathway AnalysisCancer MetabolomicsDeep LearningMetabolite ProfilingMetabolomics Data AnalysisUntargeted MetabolomicsEstrogen Receptor StatusLinear Discriminant AnalysisMachine Learning Prediction ModelsMachine Learning-based Biomarker DiscoveryMetabolic Signature DiscoveryMetabolomics Data ProcessingRecursive PartitioningRegression Trees
Metabolomics holds the promise as a new technology to diagnose highly heterogeneous diseases. Conventionally, metabolomics data analysis for diagnosis is done using various statistical and machine learning based classification methods. However, it remains unknown if deep neural network, a class of increasingly popular machine learning methods, is suitable to classify metabolomics data. Here we use a cohort of 271 breast cancer tissues, 204 positive estrogen receptor (ER+), and 67 negative estrogen receptor (ER-) to test the accuracies of feed-forward networks, a deep learning (DL) framework, as well as six widely used machine learning models, namely random forest (RF), support vector machines (SVM), recursive partitioning and regression trees (RPART), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), prediction analysis for microarrays (PAM), and generalized boosted models (GBM). DL framework has the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.93 in classifying ER+/ER- patients, compared to the other six machine learning algorithms. Furthermore, the biological interpretation of the first hidden layer reveals eight commonly enriched significant metabolomics pathways (adjusted P-value <0.05) that cannot be discovered by other machine learning methods. Among them, protein digestion and absorption and ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters pathways are also confirmed in integrated analysis between metabolomics and gene expression data in these samples. In summary, deep learning method shows advantages for metabolomics based breast cancer ER status classification, with both the highest prediction accuracy (AUC = 0.93) and better revelation of disease biology. We encourage the adoption of feed-forward networks based deep learning method in the metabolomics research community for classification.
47
pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves
Xavier Robin, Natacha Turck, Alexandre Hainard et al. · BMC Bioinformatics · 2011 · 14K citations · Full text
PubChem Substance and Compound databases
Sunghwan Kim, Paul Thiessen, Evan Bolton et al. · Nucleic Acids Research · 2015 · 5.5K citations · Full text
Pharmacy, Biochemistry, Chemistry +16
KEGG for integration and interpretation of large-scale molecular data sets
Minoru Kanehisa, Susumu Goto, Yoko Sato et al. · Nucleic Acids Research · 2011 · 5K citations · Full text