Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention · 2017 · 102 citations · 52 references
Public HealthHealth BehaviorHealth PromotionBehavioral MedicineOutcomes ResearchTobacco ControlSmoking CessationTobacco CessationTobacco PreventionTobacco UseTobacco Use CessationTobacco Use PreventionElectronic CigarettesNicotine Delivery SystemsPilot Randomized Controlled TrialsProspective EffectivenessRandomized Experiments
Abstract Background: Most studies of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) compare self-selected users versus nonusers. The few randomized studies to date generally support a positive impact on reducing smoking behavior, but these studies are focused on guided ENDS use. This study presents a randomized, naturalistic trial of ENDS with prospective outcomes of uptake and behavioral changes in smoking. Methods: Adult smokers with minimal ENDS history were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive product for 3 weeks (n = 46), or not (n = 22). Changes in nicotine delivery (16 vs. 24 mg), midway through the study allowed a compelling opportunity to examine two ENDS products compared with the control group. Primary outcomes, assessed via daily diaries during sampling period and in-person laboratory visits over 4 months, included uptake and usage of ENDS, cessation-related outcomes, and exposure to smoke constituents. Results: All ENDS participants tried product at least once, with 48% of 24 mg and 30% of 16 mg using their assigned product for the entire sampling period. Within the 24 mg ENDs group, 57% made an independent purchase of ENDS, versus 28% of 16 mg, and 14% of control participants (P = 0.01). Smokers in both ENDS groups significantly reduced their smoking, whereas control participants did not (P = 0.03). Cessation behaviors (quit attempts, biologically verified abstinence) numerically but not statistically favored ENDS participants. Conclusions: Results suggest that cigarette smokers are willing to use ENDS with trends toward reduced cigarette smoking and positive changes in cessation-related behaviors. Impact: Randomized, naturalistic trials such as presented herein are needed to understand the population impact of e-cigarettes. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(12); 1795–803. ©2017 AACR.
52
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation: a randomised controlled trial
Chris Bullen, Colin Howe, Murray Laugesen et al. · The Lancet · 2013 · 1.1K citations
Pasquale Caponnetto, Davide Campagna, Fabio Cibella et al. · PLoS ONE · 2013 · 722 citations · Full text
Public Health, Pharmacology, Comparative Effectiveness Research +15
Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems
Sarah E. Adkison, Richard J. O’Connor, Maansi Bansal‐Travers et al. · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · 2013 · 691 citations · Full text
Pharmacy, Pharmacology, Toxicology +13