2017 · 56 citations · 18 references
ComputingBusiness AnalyticsData ScienceForecastingMachine LearningPredictive AnalyticsEnsemble MethodsForecast EvaluationForecasting MethodsSales ForecastingSupport Vector MachinesTime Series ForecastingArima ModelsMachine Learning Forecasting ModelsMachine Learning-based ForecastingNeural ForecastingNeural Time Series ForecastingNonlinear Forecasting ModelsNonlinear Regression ModelsPredictive Sales Analytics
Forecasting is an integral part of any organization for their decision-making process so that they can predict their targets and modify their strategy in order to improve their sales or productivity in the coming future. This paper evaluates and compares various machine learning models, namely, ARIMA, Auto Regressive Neural Network(ARNN), XGBoost, SVM, Hy-brid Models like Hybrid ARIMA-ARNN, Hybrid ARIMA-XGBoost, Hybrid ARIMA-SVM and STL Decomposition (using ARIMA, Snaive, XGBoost) to forecast sales of a drug store company called Rossmann. Training data set contains past sales and supplemental information about drug stores. Accuracy of these models is measured by metrics such as MAE and RMSE. Initially, linear model such as ARIMA has been applied to forecast sales. ARIMA was not able to capture nonlinear patterns precisely, hence nonlinear models such as Neural Network, XGBoost and SVM were used. Nonlinear models performed better than ARIMA and gave low RMSE. Then, to further optimize the performance, composite models were designed using hybrid technique and decomposition technique. Hybrid ARIMA-ARNN, Hybrid ARIMA-XGBoost, Hybrid ARIMA-SVM were used and all of them performed better than their respective individual models. Then, the composite model was designed using STL Decomposition where the decomposed components namely seasonal, trend and remainder components were forecasted by Snaive, ARIMA and XGBoost. STL gave better results than individual and hybrid models. This paper evaluates and analyzes why composite models give better results than an individual model and state that decomposition technique is better than the hybrid technique for this application.
18
ARIMA models to predict next-day electricity prices
Javier Contreras, Rosa Espínola, Francisco J. Nogales et al. · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · 2003 · 1.5K citations
ARIMA Models to Predict Next-Day Electricity Prices
Javier Contreras, Rosario Espinola, Francisco J. Nogales et al. · IEEE Power Engineering Review · 2002 · 941 citations
Phatchakorn Areekul, Tomonobu Senjyu, Hirofumi Toyama et al. · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · 2009 · 137 citations