Frontiers in Psychology · 2017 · 98 citations · 23 references
Social SciencesBehavioral SciencesPsychologyItem Response TheoryPersonality PsychologyPsychometricsFactor AnalysisItem AnalysisItem Characteristic CurvesLatent Trait ModelingPersonality AssessmentPsychological TestingCross-group Factor ComparisonsItem Factor AnalysisItem Response Theory AnalysisItem Response Theory ScalingPersonality FacetsPsychometric ModelingPsychometric PropertiesPsychometric Quality
Scales attempting to measure procrastination focus on different facets of the phenomenon, yet they share a common understanding of procrastination as an unnecessary, unwanted, and disadvantageous delay. The present paper examines in a global sample (N = 4,169) five different procrastination scales – Decisional Procrastination Scale (DPS), Irrational Procrastination Scale (IPS), Pure Procrastination Scale (PPS), Adult Inventory of Procrastination Scale (AIP), and General Procrastination Scale (GPS), focusing on factor structures and item functioning using Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Item Response Theory. The results indicated that The Pure Procrastination Scale (PPS; 12 items selected from DPS, AIP, and GPS) measures different facets of procrastination even better than the three scales it is based on. An even shorter version of the PPS (5 items focusing on irrational delay), corresponds well to the 9-item Irrational Procrastination Scale (IPS). Both scales demonstrate good psychometric properties and appear to be superior measures of core procrastination attributes than alternative procrastination scales.
23
Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research
Choice Reviews Online · 2007 · 15.8K citations
Social Sciences, Educational Measurement, Method Validation +12