Memes as games: The evolution of a digital discourse online

TLDR

Memes constantly change as they spread, making inference from them a pressing challenge, and this study contributes to literature on their subversive diffusion in popular and political culture. The study proposes a theoretical framework to explain how and why certain memes become prevalent political discourse online. The authors illustrate the framework by mapping Shepard Fairey’s Obama Hope Poster online and using structural rhetorical analysis to categorize memes on branching diagrams as they evolve. The authors find that meme selection and mutation are driven by wasteful play online, social media political expression, and cultural evolution, and that mapping these variations helps organize memes as expressions of community values.

Abstract

This study proposes a theoretical framework for understanding how and why certain memes prevail as a form of political discourse online. Since memes are constantly changing as they spread, drawing inferences from a population of memes as concrete digital artifacts is a pressing challenge for researchers. This article argues that meme selection and mutation are driven by a cooperative combination of three types of communication logic: wasteful play online, social media political expression, and cultural evolution. To illustrate this concept, we map Shepard Fairey’s Obama Hope Poster as it spreads online. Employing structural rhetorical analysis, the study categorizes Internet memes on branching diagrams as they evolve. We argue that mapping these variations is a useful tool for organizing memes as an expression of the values and preferences embedded in online communities. The study adds to the growing literature around the subversive nature of memetic diffusion in popular and political culture.