Journal of European Public Policy · 2017 · 22 citations · 49 references
Public AffairsPolitical ScienceRegulatory PolicyExecutive PoliticsIndependent Regulatory AgenciesRegulatory GovernanceAgency IndependenceBoard RolesEuropean Union InstitutionsEuropean Union StudiesPolitical-administrative RelationsRegulatory AgenciesEuropean Union AgenciesEuropean Union BureaucracyEuropean Union Executive PoliticsEuropean Union Policy-makingEuropean Union PoliticsEuropean Union Regulatory PoliticsGig Career TrajectoriesMultiple Veto Players
Some scholars consider that European Union agencies (EAs) were created as independent bodies in order to enhance the credibility of the European Union decision-making process. Scholars have typically focused on analysing the relationship that these agencies have with politicians. However, relatively little attention has been paid to their relationship with stakeholders. This study examines the professional trajectory of EA board members, identifying their career ties with politicians and stakeholders. Using an original dataset on the career trajectories of 338 top officials in 33 EAs, the findings provide evidence that the type of appointing body matters: on the one hand, the European Parliament is more likely – than the Commission – to appoint individuals having career ties to politicians; on the other hand, multiple veto players are less likely to designate board members linked to political players. Additionally, the findings suggest that agencies performing regulatory tasks seem to be more inclined to have lower levels of de facto independence from politicians.
49