Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science · 2017 · 44 citations · 31 references
EducationKinesiologySports MedicineExercise PhysiologyExercise TestingPhysical ActivityAthletic PerformanceFitness AssessmentMuscle Strength TestingPhysical FitnessPhysical Fitness AssessmentPhysical Performance AssessmentAssessment UsefulnessExercise Test ReliabilityExercise Test ValidityFitness Test ReliabilityFitness Test ValidityJump Test PerformanceReliability Of Fitness TestsSports Performance Testing
This study aimed to evaluate the between-day reliability and usefulness of a fitness testing battery in a group of youth sport athletes. Fifty-nine youth sport athletes (age = 17.3 ± 0.7 years) undertook a fitness testing battery including the isometric mid-thigh pull, counter-movement jump, 5–40 m sprint splits, and the 5–0-5 change of direction test on two occasions separated by 7 days. Usefulness was assessed by comparing the reliability (typical error) to the smallest worthwhile change. The typical error was 5.5% for isometric mid-thigh pull and 3.8% for counter-movement jump. The typical error values were 2.7, 2.5, 2.2, 2.2, and 1.8% for the 5, 10, 20, 30, and 40 m sprint splits, and 4.1% (left) and 5.4% (right) for the 5–0-5 tests. The smallest worthwhile change ranged from 1.1 to 6.1%. All tests were identified as having “good” or “acceptable” reliability. The isometric mid-thigh pull and counter-movement jump had “good” usefulness, all other tests had “marginal” usefulness.
31
Measures of Reliability in Sports Medicine and Science
Will G. Hopkins · Sports Medicine · 2000 · 4.5K citations
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
L. Perry Koziris · Strength and conditioning journal · 2003 · 1.6K citations
Education, Kinesiology, Physiology +14
A multidisciplinary approach to talent identification in soccer
Thomas Reilly, A. Mark Williams, Alan Nevill et al. · Journal of Sports Sciences · 2000 · 1K citations