Environmental Policy and Governance · 2017 · 409 citations · 60 references
Natural SciencesEnvironmental PolicySustainability ScienceSustainable DevelopmentSustainable InnovationEmpowerment ApproachesPolitical PowerPower In ChangeSustainability TransitionsSustainability TransformationSustainability Transitions IndicatorsSustainable Transformation
Transition studies have been criticized for neglecting power, prompting efforts to theorize power and agency in sustainability transitions. This study introduces the POwer‑IN‑Transition (POINT) framework to conceptualize and analyze power and (dis)empowerment in sustainability transitions and transition governance. POINT is built by reviewing transition studies, outlining a typology of power relations (reinforcive, innovative, transformative), reframing the multi‑level perspective in power‑dynamic terms, and examining challenges of (dis)empowerment and unintended power implications of sustainability transition discourses and policies. The paper synthesizes these arguments and identifies challenges for future research on power in sustainability transitions. © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.
Abstract This paper conceptualizes power and empowerment in the context of sustainability transitions and transition governance. The field of transition studies has been critically interrogated for undermining the role of power, which has inspired various endeavours to theorize power and agency in transitions. This paper presents the POwer‐IN‐Transition framework (POINT), which is developed as a conceptual framework to analyse power and (dis)empowerment in transformative social change, integrating transition concepts and multiple power and empowerment theories. The first section introduces transitions studies and discusses its state‐of‐the‐art regarding power. This is followed by a typology of power relations and different types of power (reinforcive, innovative, transformative). These notions are then used to reframe transition concepts, in particular the multi‐level perspective, in terms of power dynamics. The critical challenges of (dis)empowerment and unintended power implications of discourses on and policies for ‘sustainability transitions’ are discussed. The paper concludes with a synthesis of the arguments and challenges for future research. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment
60
A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation
William H. Sewell · American Journal of Sociology · 1992 · 5.3K citations
Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways
Frank W. Geels, Johan Schot · Research Policy · 2007 · 5K citations · Full text