The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness · 2017 · 14 citations · 0 references
EducationKinesiologySports MedicineExercise TestingHuman PerformancePhysical ActivityAnthropometric VariationAthletic PerformancePhysical FitnessPhysical Performance AssessmentSports BiomechanicsTalent Development In SportAnthropometric Muscle MeasurementsAthletic Performance TestingEffect SizeLikelihood Ratio TestingLikelihood Ratio TestsRelative Age DeterminationShuttle Run TestSports Performance Testing
BACKGROUND: The aim of this work was to study anthropometric and performance measurements in 60 young male volleyball players (YV) and 60 youth not active in the sport (YNA) to assess which of these would be more useful to study the characteristics of potential performers. METHODS: Eight measures to assess anthropometric characteristics, six performance measures and two tests for joint mobility were used. Also relative age and level of maturation were assessed. RESULTS: The anthropometric variables, relative age and level of maturation measured did not show statistically significant differences between groups. The YV and YNA groups showed differences in the performance measures. YV group was characterized by a better performance of the ability to repeat short sprints, of the upper limbs, abdominal muscles and lower limbs, with a medium effect size (Shuttle Running Test: 0.6; Push-Up: 0.5; Sit-Up: 0.4; counter movement jump: 0.4). These performance variables were very sensitive and specific: the SRT measurement had the best positive likelihood ratio that indicates the utility of the test in identifying type of players (YV and YNA). CONCLUSIONS: In talent detection in youth volleyball, in the 11-13 age range, performance variables should be preferred to anthropometric ones.