Gastroenterology Research and Practice · 2017 · 62 citations · 21 references
Veterinary MedicineHematologyImmunologyClinical ImmunologyInflammationMucosal ImmunologyChronic InflammationClinical HematologyGastrointestinal InflammationImmune-mediated Inflammatory DiseasesInflammatory BiomarkersInflammatory Bowel DiseaseComplete Blood Count InterpretationNeutrophil-to-lymphocyte RatioPlatelet-to-lymphocyte Ratio
The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic efficacy of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), neutrophil-to-monocyte ratio (NMR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) and non-CD controls. These ratios were all derived from complete blood counts. Two hundred and six participants including CD inpatients and non-CD controls were retrospectively enrolled. We found statistically higher NLR and PLR and lower LMR in CD patients than in non-CD controls (all <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M1"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo><</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.01</mml:mn></mml:math>). However, NMR was not different between the two groups (<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M2"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.18</mml:mn></mml:math>). In addition, NLR, PLR, and LMR were associated with CRP and ESR. Optimal cutoffs for NLR and PLR were 2.72 (sensitivity: 68.3%, specificity: 75.9%, and overall accuracy: 70.1%) and 132.88 (sensitivity: 76.7%, specificity: 84.8%, and overall accuracy: 80.8%), respectively. In conclusion, the NLR and PLR might be effective, readily available, and low-cost biomarkers for differentiating CD patients from non-CD controls.
21
Taina Sipponen, Erkki Savilahti, Kaija‐Leena Kolho et al. · Inflammatory Bowel Diseases · 2007 · 477 citations · Full text
Medicine, Immunology, Pathology +16