Quantitative Comparison of the Intraoperative Utility of Indocyanine Green and Fluorescein Videoangiographies in Cerebrovascular Surgery

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND: A quantitative analysis comparing indocyanine green videoangiography (ICG-VAG) and fluorescein videoangiography (FL-VAG) in cerebrovascular surgery has not been reported so far. OBJECTIVE: To clear the differences of characteristics of ICG-VAG and FL-VAG by quantitative assessment. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed results from 23 patients (3 males; mean age at surgery: 60.9 years, range: 14-75 years) at our hospital from August 2014 to July 2015. Eighteen patients had cerebral aneurysms for clipping, and 5 had intracranial arterial stenosis for superficial temporal artery (STA)–middle cerebral artery bypass. We imported data from the operative image data, converted by Audio Video Interleave to Aquacosmos as picture fluorescence intensity-analyzing software. Regions of interest were set at the parent artery, dome of aneurysms, and perforating artery in cases of clipping of aneurysms, and setting at 3 points in STA, in case of bypass. The transition of fluorescence intensity at each region of interest was calculated and plotted using Aquacosmos. RESULTS: Thick-walled artery, such as parent artery ( P = .0017) and STA ( P = .0182), was more significantly visualized by ICG-VAG than FL-VAG, whereas the perforating artery, especially in deep surgical fields, such as anterior communicating artery, internal carotid artery, and basilar artery, was better visualized by FL-VAG than ICG-VAG ( P < .0001). CONCLUSION: In this quantitative analysis of fluorescence study, ICG-VAG showed greater efficacy than FL-VAG in visualizing relatively thick arteries, such as parent artery and STA. However, FL-VAG has greater efficacy than ICG-VAG in visualizing perforating artery, especially in deep surgical fields with characteristic vessel walls.