International Affairs · 1996 · 149 citations · 0 references
Social SciencesConflict StudiesOrganization StudiesConflict AnalysisGroup DynamicsIntergroup RelationsConflict Resolution In GroupsGroup ConflictIntergroup ConflictOrganizational Conflict
Hardin challenges conventional explanations of group conflict, arguing that collective violence is driven by systematic exploitation of self‑interest in group identification. He investigates how leaders harness hatred to mobilize people, the logic of pre‑emptive strikes, the risks of particularist communitarianism, and proposes government structures to limit group dominance. Using case studies from Mafia vendettas to Bosnian, Rwandan, and Irish ethnic violence, he shows how social and economic conditions, combined with leaders’ manipulation of hatred, trigger group conflict when individual and group interests merge. He concludes that group movements pursue personal political and economic gains at others’ expense, and that designing institutions to support individual goals rather than ethnic identities creates a safer society.
In a book that challenges the most widely held ideas of why individuals engage in collective conflict, Russell Hardin offers an explanation of group action in its most destructive forms. Contrary to those observers who attribute group violence to irrationality, primordial instinct, or complex psychology, Hardin uncovers a systematic exploitation of self-interest in the underpinnings of group identification and collective violence. Using examples from Mafia vendettas to ethnic violence in places such as Bosnia and Rwanda, he describes the social and economic circumstances that set this violence into motion. Hardin explains why hatred alone does not necessarily start wars but how leaders cultivate it to mobilize their people. He also reveals the thinking behind the pre-emptive strikes that contribute to much of the violence between groups, identifies the dangers of particularist communitarianism, and argues for government structures to prevent any ethnic or other group from having too much sway. Exploring conflict between groups such as Serbs and Croats, Hutu and Tutsi, Northern Irish Catholics and Protestants, Hardin vividly illustrates the danger that arises when individual and group interests merge. In these examples, groups of people have been governed by movements that managed to reflect their members' personal interests - mainly by striving for political and economic advances at the expense of other groups and by closing themselves off from society at large. The author concludes that we make a better and safer world if we design our social institutions to facilitate individual efforts to achieve personal goals than if we concentrate on the ethnic political makeup of our respective societies.