Tracking the Trackers: An Analysis of the State of the Art in Multiple Object Tracking

Laura Leal-Taixé, Anton Milan, Konrad Schindler, Daniel Cremers, Ian Reid, Stefan Roth

arXiv (Cornell University) · 2017 · 94 citations · 46 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Standardized benchmarks are essential in computer vision, offering objective performance measures that guide research despite the need for cautious interpretation of leaderboards. The study introduces a Multiple Object Tracking benchmark launched in late 2014 to establish a standardized evaluation framework. The authors compiled two benchmark releases and analyzed nearly 50 state‑of‑the‑art trackers across more than 11,000 frames. The analysis reveals current trends and weaknesses in multi‑person tracking and offers guidance for future research directions.

Abstract

Standardized benchmarks are crucial for the majority of computer vision applications. Although leaderboards and ranking tables should not be over-claimed, benchmarks often provide the most objective measure of performance and are therefore important guides for research. We present a benchmark for Multiple Object Tracking launched in the late 2014, with the goal of creating a framework for the standardized evaluation of multiple object tracking methods. This paper collects the two releases of the benchmark made so far, and provides an in-depth analysis of almost 50 state-of-the-art trackers that were tested on over 11000 frames. We show the current trends and weaknesses of multiple people tracking methods, and provide pointers of what researchers should be focusing on to push the field forward.

References

46