Diagnostic accuracy of individual antenatal tools for prediction of small‐for‐gestational age at birth

Borna Poljak, Umber Agarwal, Richard Jackson, Žarko Alfirević, Andrew Sharp

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2016 · 37 citations · 20 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective To determine the accuracy of fetal and newborn growth charts for the prediction of small‐for‐gestational age ( SGA ) at birth (birth weight < 10 th centile). Methods This was a prospective cohort study performed within a UK specialist fetal growth clinic. A total of 105 consecutive pregnant women referred for a suspected SGA fetus were included. All pregnancies were managed according to a standard protocol using estimated fetal weight ( EFW ) plotted on customized Gestation Related Optimal Weight ( GROW ) charts. The last antenatal estimates of EFW (according to charts of GROW , Hadlock et al . and Mikolajczyk et al .), abdominal circumference ( AC ) (according to charts of Hadlock et al ., INTERGROWTH‐21 st Project and Chitty et al .) or change in AC over time (calculated according to Pregnancy Outcome Prediction ( POP ) study) were compared against four birth‐weight charts ( GROW , INTERGROWTH‐21 st , Mikolajczyk et al . and World Health Organization (WHO)). The ability of each antenatal test to predict adverse perinatal outcome ( APO ) was assessed. Results Birth weight < 10 th centile was assigned in 62 (59%) neonates using the GROW chart, 57 (54%) using the Mikolajczyk et al. chart, 55 (52%) using the INTERGROWTH‐21 st chart and 51 (49%) using the WHO chart. AC ‐Hadlock had the best negative likelihood ratio (range, 0.3–0.4) and sensitivity (range, 74%–82%) for predicting SGA as defined by all four postnatal birth‐weight charts. AC ‐ INTERGROWTH ‐21 st had the best positive likelihood ratio (range, 5.9–10.9) and specificity (94%–96%). For prediction of APO , AC ‐Hadlock and EFW ‐ GROW had the best sensitivities (57% and 52%, respectively), whereas AC ‐ POP had the best positive likelihood ratio (2.2) and specificity (88%). Antenatal prediction of APO increased to a sensitivity of 61% when AC ‐ POP and EFW ‐ GROW were combined; however, specificity was only 56%. Conclusions We have identified wide variation in the diagnostic accuracy of various antenatal tools for the prediction of both SGA and APO , dependent on the choice of chart. Suboptimal diagnostic accuracy of commonly used antenatal tests may lead to increasing medicalization without prevention of APO . Researchers should focus their attention on a combination of fetal biometry and biomarkers for better prediction of SGA and prevention of APO . Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

References

20