Evidence-Based Medicine · 2017 · 675 citations · 12 references
Public HealthBiostatisticsCausal InferenceEvidence-based PracticeMeta-analysisNarrative AssessmentStudy SelectionSubgroup AnalysisSystematic ReviewConfidence In Evidence AssessmentEvidence Certainty AssessmentGrade Evidence AssessmentLevel Of Evidence GradingMeta-analysis Of Treatment EffectsMeta-analytic Decision MakingPoint EstimatePooled Treatment Effect
When studies measure or report outcomes differently, it may not be feasible to pool data across studies to generate a single effect estimate (ie, perform meta-analysis). Instead, only a narrative summary of the effect across different studies might be available. Regardless of whether a single pooled effect estimate is generated or whether data are summarised narratively, decision makers need to know the certainty in the evidence in order to make informed decisions. In this guide, we illustrate how to apply the constructs of the GRADE (Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach to assess the certainty in evidence when a meta-analysis has not been performed and data were summarised narratively.
12
GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence
Howard Balshem, Mark Helfand, Holger J. Schünemann et al. · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2011 · 8.2K citations
Education, Educational Assessment, Evidence-based Practice +10
GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision
Gordon Guyatt, Andrew D Oxman, Regina Kunz et al. · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2011 · 2.7K citations