Skin Research and Technology · 2017 · 10 citations · 10 references
NursingBioengineeringDermatologyBiocompatibilityBiomaterialsCosmetic DermatologyBiodegradationGelsSkin CareSkin PreparationSurface CleaningWound CleansingCleansing EfficacyDirt ContentGel Cleaning SystemsSkin Irritation ManagementSkin Irritation PreventionTopical GelsWater ReservoirsWax Beads
Background/purpose The plastic microbeads, used in many cleansers, will be banned in cosmetic and personal care products within 2017 since they are non‐degradable and can disturb the living organisms in water reservoirs. Various choices of biodegradable beads are commercially available, but their efficacy has not been proven yet. This study aimed to compare the cleansing efficacy in dirt and sebum removal aspects of three types of exfoliating beads. Methods The gel scrubs with polyethylene ( PE ) beads, mannan beads or wax beads, were formulated and evaluated for their stability. The in vivo evaluation was done in 38 healthy volunteers and the skin irritation, efficacy for dirt and sebum removal were measured by Mexameter ® , Colorimeter ® , and Sebumeter ® , respectively. Results The selected gel scrubs did not cause an irritation in any volunteers. The differences in dirt residues between before and after scrubbing were not statistically significant among three gel scrubs and the similar result was also reported in the sebum removal study. Conclusion All gel scrubs demonstrated the comparable cleansing efficacy in term of dirt and sebum removal. Thus, mannan beads and wax beads may be replaced non‐biodegradable PE beads to achieve the similar cleansing effect.
10