British Journal of Urology · 2017 · 81 citations · 31 references
MedicineOncologyUrologyDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic RadiologyGenitourinary OncologyActive SurveillanceProstate BiopsyProstate CancerProstate ImagingProstate-specific Antigen TestingTransrectal UltrasonographyMagnetic Resonance Imaging - Targeted BiopsyPrimary Outcome AnalysisProstate Cancer Risk StratificationProstate-specific Antigen DensityRisk Stratification Using Prostate-specific AntigenSurveillance BiopsySystematic Prostate BiopsyTargeted Prostate Biopsy
Objectives To assess the value of risk‐stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging ( MRI ) and prostate‐specific antigen density ( PSA ‐D) in reducing unnecessary biopsies without missing Gleason pattern 4 prostate cancer in men on active surveillance ( AS ). Patients and Methods In all, 210 men on AS with Gleason score 3 + 3 prostate cancer received a first MRI and if indicated [Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System ( PI ‐ RADS ) score ≥3] targeted biopsy ( TB x) using MRI ‐transrectal ultrasonography ( TRUS ) fusion. The MRI was performed 3 months after diagnosis (group A: n = 97), at confirmatory biopsy (group B: n = 39) or at surveillance biopsy after one or more repeat TRUS ‐guided systematic biopsies ( TRUS ‐Bx) (group C: n = 74). The primary outcome was upgrading to Gleason score ≥3 + 4 prostate cancer based on MRI ± TB x in groups A, B and C. Biopsy outcomes were stratified for the overall PI ‐ RADS score and PSA ‐D to identify a subgroup of men in whom a biopsy could have been avoided as no Gleason score upgrading was detected. Results In all, 134/210 (64%) men had a positive MRI and 51/210 (24%) men had Gleason score upgrading based on MRI ‐ TB x. The percentage of Gleason score upgrading based on MRI ‐ TB x was 23% (22/97), 23% (9/39) and 27% (20/74) in respectively groups A, B and C. Additional Gleason score upgrading detected by TRUS ‐Bx occurred in 8% (3/39) of men in group B and 6% (1/17) of men who received TRUS ‐Bx in group C. No Gleason score upgrading was detected by MRI ‐ TB x in men with a PI ‐ RADS score of 3 and a PSA ‐D of <0.15 ng/ mL 2 ( n = 15), nor by TRUS ‐Bx in men with a PI ‐ RADS score of 1–3 and a PSA ‐D of <0.15 ng/ mL 2 ( n = 15). Conclusion At least one out of five men on AS with Gleason score 3 + 3 prostate cancer at diagnostic TRUS ‐Bx show Gleason score upgrading based on first MRI ± TB x at baseline, confirmatory or surveillance biopsy. Men with a PI ‐ RADS score of 1–3 and PSA ‐D of <0.15 ng/ mL 2 did not show Gleason score upgrading at MRI ± TB x or TRUS ‐Bx at each time point of surveillance. Thus risk‐stratification based on PI ‐ RADS and PSA ‐D may reduce unnecessary follow‐up biopsy procedures in men on AS.
31
PI-RADS Prostate Imaging – Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2
Jeffrey C. Weinreb, Jelle O. Barentsz, Peter L. Choyke et al. · European Urology · 2015 · 2.9K citations
Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Worldwide: The PRIAS Study
Meelan Bul, Xiaoye Zhu, R. Valdagni et al. · European Urology · 2012 · 542 citations
Leonard P. Bokhorst, R. Valdagni, Antti Rannikko et al. · European Urology · 2016 · 397 citations · Full text
Satoshi Washino, Tomohisa Okochi, Kimitoshi Saito et al. · British Journal of Urology · 2016 · 306 citations · Full text