International Journal of Retina and Vitreous · 2017 · 124 citations · 21 references
MedicineOphthalmologyVision ScienceClinical Vision ScienceOcular AnatomyOcular ImagingImage QualityImage Quality AssessmentOptical Coherence TomographyRetinal AnatomyRetinal Image QualityRetinal ImagingEn Face ImagingImage Quality MetricsMotion Artifact DetectionOptical Coherence Tomography AngiographyRetinal Image Quality AssessmentRetinal Layer SegmentationRetinal Vasculature ImagingRetinal Vessel Imaging
BACKGROUND: To study the impact of image quality on quantitative measurements and the frequency of segmentation error with optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). METHODS: Seventeen eyes of 10 healthy individuals were included in this study. OCTA was performed using a swept-source device (Triton, Topcon). Each subject underwent three scanning sessions 1-2 min apart; the first two scans were obtained under standard conditions and for the third session, the image quality index was reduced using application of a topical ointment. En face OCTA images of the retinal vasculature were generated using the default segmentation for the superficial and deep retinal layer (SRL, DRL). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used as a measure for repeatability. The frequency of segmentation error, motion artifact, banding artifact and projection artifact was also compared among the three sessions. RESULTS: The frequency of segmentation error, and motion artifact was statistically similar between high and low image quality sessions (P = 0.707, and P = 1 respectively). However, the frequency of projection and banding artifact was higher with a lower image quality. The vessel density in the SRL was highly repeatable in the high image quality sessions (ICC = 0.8), however, the repeatability was low, comparing the high and low image quality measurements (ICC = 0.3). In the DRL, the repeatability of the vessel density measurements was fair in the high quality sessions (ICC = 0.6 and ICC = 0.5, with and without automatic artifact removal, respectively) and poor comparing high and low image quality sessions (ICC = 0.3 and ICC = 0.06, with and without automatic artifact removal, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of artifacts is higher and the repeatability of the measurements is lower with lower image quality. The impact of image quality index should be always considered in OCTA based quantitative measurements.
21
NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis
Caroline A Schneider, Wayne Rasband, Kevin W. Eliceiri · Nature Methods · 2012 · 65.2K citations
IMAGE ARTIFACTS IN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY
Richard F. Spaide, James G. Fujimoto, Nadia K. Waheed · Retina · 2015 · 1K citations · Full text
Adeleh Yarmohammadi, Linda M. Zangwill, Alberto Diniz‐Filho et al. · Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science · 2016 · 503 citations · Full text