eLife · 2017 · 588 citations · 61 references
EngineeringNeuroscienceRehabilitation MedicineAssistive TechnologyNeural EngineeringNeurorehabilitationBrain-computer InterfacesCommunication RehabilitationElectroencephalographyNeural InterfacesNeurorehabilitation EngineeringNeurostimulationAssistive Communication InterfacesAssistive Communication TechnologyAssistive Neural DevicesBrain-machine InterfacesHigh PerformanceIntracortical ConnectivityIntracortical FacilitationIntracortical Interfaces
BCIs can restore communication for people with tetraplegia and anarthria by translating neural activity into control signals, yet current human clinical systems lack the performance needed for widespread adoption. This study reports a high‑performance intracortical BCI for communication tested on three participants with paralysis. The system uses advanced decoder designs from prior pre‑clinical and clinical work. All three participants achieved typing rates 1.4–4.2 times higher and information throughput 2.2–4.0 times higher than previous iBCIs, demonstrating the potential of iBCIs as powerful assistive communication devices. Clinical trial NCT00912041.
Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) have the potential to restore communication for people with tetraplegia and anarthria by translating neural activity into control signals for assistive communication devices. While previous pre-clinical and clinical studies have demonstrated promising proofs-of-concept (Serruya et al., 2002; Simeral et al., 2011; Bacher et al., 2015; Nuyujukian et al., 2015; Aflalo et al., 2015; Gilja et al., 2015; Jarosiewicz et al., 2015; Wolpaw et al., 1998; Hwang et al., 2012; Spüler et al., 2012; Leuthardt et al., 2004; Taylor et al., 2002; Schalk et al., 2008; Moran, 2010; Brunner et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2013; Townsend and Platsko, 2016; Vansteensel et al., 2016; Nuyujukian et al., 2016; Carmena et al., 2003; Musallam et al., 2004; Santhanam et al., 2006; Hochberg et al., 2006; Ganguly et al., 2011; O’Doherty et al., 2011; Gilja et al., 2012), the performance of human clinical BCI systems is not yet high enough to support widespread adoption by people with physical limitations of speech. Here we report a high-performance intracortical BCI (iBCI) for communication, which was tested by three clinical trial participants with paralysis. The system leveraged advances in decoder design developed in prior pre-clinical and clinical studies (Gilja et al., 2015; Kao et al., 2016; Gilja et al., 2012). For all three participants, performance exceeded previous iBCIs (Bacher et al., 2015; Jarosiewicz et al., 2015) as measured by typing rate (by a factor of 1.4–4.2) and information throughput (by a factor of 2.2–4.0). This high level of performance demonstrates the potential utility of iBCIs as powerful assistive communication devices for people with limited motor function. Clinical Trial No: NCT00912041
61
Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegia
Leigh R. Hochberg, Mijail D. Serruya, Gerhard M. Friehs et al. · Nature · 2006 · 3.3K citations
High-performance neuroprosthetic control by an individual with tetraplegia
Jennifer L. Collinger, Brian Wodlinger, John E. Downey et al. · The Lancet · 2012 · 1.9K citations
Learning to Control a Brain–Machine Interface for Reaching and Grasping by Primates
Jose M. Carmena, Mikhail Lebedev, Roy E. Crist et al. · PLoS Biology · 2003 · 1.8K citations · Full text
Cortical control of a prosthetic arm for self-feeding
Meel Velliste, Sagi Perel, M. Chance Spalding et al. · Nature · 2008 · 1.6K citations