Trials · 2017 · 32 citations · 42 references
Public HealthHealth BehaviorHealth PromotionBehavior Change TheoryImplementation SciencePhysical ActivityBehavior ChangeBehavior Change StrategiesCardiovascular Risk ReductionHealth CoachingPhysical Activity PromotionSelf-managementBehavior Change InterventionsBehavior Change TechniquesCardiovascular Disease ManagementHealth Behavior ChangeHealth-related Behavior ChangePhysical Activity Self-managementRegistered NursesSelf-management Of Activity
BACKGROUND: Self-management interventions are considered effective in patients with chronic disease, but trials have shown inconsistent results, and it is unknown which patients benefit most. Adequate self-management requires behaviour change in both patients and health care providers. Therefore, the Activate intervention was developed with a focus on behaviour change in both patients and nurses. The intervention aims for change in a single self-management behaviour, namely physical activity, in primary care patients at risk for cardiovascular disease. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the Activate intervention. METHODS/DESIGN: A two-arm cluster randomised controlled trial will be conducted to compare the Activate intervention with care as usual at 31 general practices in the Netherlands. Approximately 279 patients at risk for cardiovascular disease will participate. The Activate intervention is developed using the Behaviour Change Wheel and consists of 4 nurse-led consultations in a 3-month period, integrating 17 behaviour change techniques. The Behaviour Change Wheel was also applied to analyse what behaviour change is needed in nurses to deliver the intervention adequately. This resulted in 1-day training and coaching sessions (including 21 behaviour change techniques). The primary outcome is physical activity, measured as the number of minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity using an accelerometer. Potential effect modifiers are age, body mass index, level of education, social support, depression, patient-provider relationship and baseline number of minutes of physical activity. Data will be collected at baseline and at 3 months and 6 months of follow-up. A process evaluation will be conducted to evaluate the training of nurses, treatment fidelity, and to identify barriers to and facilitators of implementation as well as to assess participants' satisfaction. DISCUSSION: To increase physical activity in patients and to support nurses in delivering the intervention, behaviour change techniques are applied to change behaviours of the patients and nurses. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the intervention, exploration of which patients benefit most, and evaluation of our theory-based training for primary care nurses will enhance understanding of what works and for whom, which is essential for further implementation of self-management in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02725203 . Registered on 25 March 2016.
42
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Virginia Braun, Victoria Clarke · Qualitative Research in Psychology · 2006 · 183.3K citations · Full text
Social Sciences, Psychology, Communication Research Methods +10
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
A. S. Zigmond, R. P. Snaith · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · 1983 · 46.6K citations
Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance
Peter Craig, Paul Dieppe, Sally MacIntyre et al. · BMJ · 2008 · 11.4K citations · Full text
Susan Michie, Michelle Richardson, Marie Johnston et al. · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · 2013 · 8K citations · Full text
Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance
Gary F. Moore, Suzanne Audrey, Mary Barker et al. · BMJ · 2015 · 6.5K citations · Full text
Public Affairs, Health Policy, Comparative Effectiveness Research +9