Health researcher views on comparative effectiveness research and research engagement

Laura P. Forsythe, Lori Frank, Thomas A Workman, Amanda E. Borsky, Tandrea Hilliard, Daniel Harwell, Lauren Fayish

Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research · 2017 · 19 citations · 13 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

Abstract

AIM: To understand researcher capability for and interest in patient-centered comparative effectiveness research (PC-CER), particularly related to engaging with patients/caregivers. MATERIALS & METHODS: Web-based survey of 508 health researchers recruited via professional health research organizations. RESULTS: Most respondents (94%) were familiar with CER and many (69%) reported having previously conducting some form of CER. Most respondents were familiar with (81%) and interested in (87%) partnering with patients and/or caregivers in research. Resources to assist in training, coordination of partners, guidance in apply for funding and improved infrastructure were commonly cited factors that would help researchers conduct PC-CER. CONCLUSION: There is a significant opportunity for researchers to engage patients and caregivers as partners in CER. Researchers recognize the need for additional training and expertise to leverage those opportunities.

References

13