PLoS ONE · 2017 · 129 citations · 18 references
Life SciencesMicrobiologyBowel ManagementGastroenterologyMicrobiome ResearchBowel Function AssessmentConstipation ManagementFecal Microbiota TransplantationFunctional Gastrointestinal DisordersGut MicrobiotaLaxative TherapyChronic Constipation TreatmentCure Or Treatment ControlEnema-based Fecal Microbiota TransplantationFunctional Constipation TherapyMatched Control GroupMicrobiome-targeted TherapySlow Transit Constipation TreatmentStool Consistency Regulation
Fecal microbiota transplantation has been proposed as a therapeutic approach for chronic constipation. This randomized, controlled trial aimed to compare the effects of conventional treatment alone (control) with additional treatment with FMT (intervention) in patients with slow-transit constipation (STC). Adults with STC were randomized to receive intervention or control treatment. The control group received education, behavioral strategies, and oral laxatives. The intervention group was additionally provided 6 days of FMT. The primary endpoint was the clinical cure rate (proportion of patients achieving a mean of ≥ three complete spontaneous bowel movements [CSBMs] per week]. Secondary outcomes and safety parameters were assessed throughout the study. Sixty patients were randomized to either conventional treatment alone (n = 30) or FMT (n = 30) through a nasointestinal tube. There were significant differences between the intervention group and control group in the clinical improvement rate (intention-to-treat [ITT]: 53.3% vs. 20.0%, P = 0.009), clinical cure rate (ITT: 36.7% vs. 13.3%, P = 0.04), mean number of CSBMs per week (ITT: 3.2 ± 1.4 vs. 2.1 ± 1.2, P = 0.001), and the Wexner constipation score (ITT: 8.6 ± 1.5 vs. 12.7 ± 2.5, P < 0.00001). Compared with the control group, the intervention group showed better results in the stool consistency score (ITT: 3.9 vs. 2.4, P < 0.00001) and colonic transit time (ITT: 58.5 vs. 73.6 h, P < 0.00001). The intervention group had more treatment-related adverse events than did the control group (50 vs. 4 cases). FMT was significantly more effective (30% higher cure rate) for treatment of STC than conventional treatment. No serious adverse events were observed.
18
Simplified assessment of segmental colonic transit
Amanda M. Metcalf, Sidney F. Phillips, Alan R. Zinsmeister et al. · Gastroenterology · 1987 · 936 citations
Intestinal microbiota in functional bowel disorders: a Rome foundation report
Magnus Simrén, Giovanni Barbara, Harry J. Flint et al. · Gut · 2012 · 926 citations · Full text