Nuclear Fusion · 2017 · 174 citations · 27 references
Natural SciencesNuclear EngineeringPhysicsFusion EngineeringHeat TransferPlasma PhysicsFusion PlasmasHigh-temperature PlasmasMagnetic Confinement FusionMagnetized PlasmaNuclear FusionPlasma ConfinementDivertor PhysicsGyrokinetic SimulationsGyrokinetic TheoryPoloidal Magnetic FieldsSeparatrix SurfacesTokamak ConfinementTokamak PhysicsTokamak Plasmas
The study uses the XGC1 edge gyrokinetic code to predict the divertor heat‑flux width in attached plasma conditions. They model the heat‑flux width with the XGC1 edge gyrokinetic code. While empirical scaling predicts a divertor heat‑flux width ≤1 mm for ITER, XGC1 simulations forecast >5 mm, suggesting that acceptable divertor loads could be achieved over a broader range of separatrix densities and radiative fractions due to differing ion and electron transport contributions. Published in Nuclear Fusion 53 (2013) 093031.
The XGC1 edge gyrokinetic code is used for a high fidelity prediction for the width of the heat-flux to divertor plates in attached plasma condition. The simulation results are validated against the empirical scaling $\lambda_q \propto B_P^{-\gamma}$ obtained from present tokamak devices, where $\lambda_q$ is the divertor heat-flux width mapped to the outboard midplane and $\gamma_q=1.19$ as defined by T. Eich et al. [Nucl. Fusion 53 (2013) 093031], and $B_P$ is the magnitude of the poloidal magnetic field at outboard midplane separatrix surface. This empirical scaling predicts $\lambda_q \leq 1mm$ when extrapolated to ITER, which would require operation with very high separatrix densities $(n_{sep}/n_{Greenwald} > 0.6)$ in the Q=10 scenario to achieve semi-detached plasma operation and high radiative fractions leading to acceptable divertor power fluxes. XGC1 predicts, however, that $\lambda_q$ for ITER is over 5 mm, suggesting that operation in the ITER Q=10 scenario with acceptable divertor power loads could be obtained over a wider range of plasma separatrix densities and radiative fractions. The physics reason behind this difference is, according to the XGC1 results, that while the ion magnetic drift contribution to the divertor heat-flux width is wider in the present tokamaks, the turbulent electron contribution is wider in ITER. A high current C-Mod discharge is found to be in a mixed regime: While the heat-flux width by the ion neoclassical magnetic drift is still wider than the turbulent electron heat-flux width, the heat-flux magnitude is dominated by the narrower electron heat-flux.
27
Zonal flows in plasma—a review
P. H. Diamond, S-I Itoh, K. Itoh et al. · Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion · 2005 · 1.9K citations · Full text
Reconstruction of current profile parameters and plasma shapes in tokamaks
L. L. Lao, H. St. John, R.D. Stambaugh et al. · Nuclear Fusion · 1985 · 1.8K citations
Scaling of the tokamak near the scrape-off layer H-mode power width and implications for ITER
T. Eich, A.W. Leonard, R.A. Pitts et al. · Nuclear Fusion · 2013 · 608 citations
Density limits in toroidal plasmas
M. Greenwald · Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion · 2002 · 525 citations · Full text