BMC Microbiology · 2017 · 107 citations · 35 references
Life SciencesBiologyMicrobiologyDiagnostic MicrobiologyMass Spectrometric AnalysisMycologyFungal ClassificationFungal DiagnosticsFungal IdentificationMicrobial IdentificationTaxonomic DatabasesTaxonomic ProfilingGenus-level IdentificationIdentificationMaldi-tof IdentificationMaldi-tof Mass SpectrometryMass Spectrometry-based IdentificationMold IdentificationMolecular Identification Of FungiThresholds
BACKGROUND: Several Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight mass spectrometry protocols, which differ in identification criteria, have been developed for mold and dermatophyte identification. Currently, the most widely used approach is Bruker technology, although no consensus concerning the log(score) threshold has been established. Furthermore, it remains unknown how far increasing the number of spots to compare results might improve identification performance. In this study, we used in-house and Bruker reference databases as well as a panel of 422 isolates belonging to 126 species to test various thresholds. Ten distinct identification algorithms requiring one to four spots were tested. RESULTS: Our findings indicate that optimal results were obtained by applying a decisional algorithm in which only the highest score of four spots was taken into account with a 1.7 log(score) threshold. Testing the entire panel enabled identification of 87.41% (in-house database) and 35.15% (Bruker database) of isolates, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 1 at the genus level for both databases as well as 0.89 PPV (in-house database) and 0.72 PPV (Bruker database) at the species level. Applying the same rules to the isolates for which the species were represented by at least three strains in the database enabled identification of 92.1% (in-house database) and 46.6% (Bruker database) of isolates, with 1 PPV at the genus level for both databases as well as 0.95 PPV (in-house database) and 0.93 PPV (Bruker database) at the species level. CONCLUSIONS: Depositing four spots per extract and lowering the threshold to 1.7, a threshold which is notably lower than that recommended for bacterial identification, decreased the number of unidentified specimens without altering the reliability of the accepted results. Nevertheless, regardless of the criteria used for mold and dermatophyte identification, commercial databases require optimization.
35
László Irinyi, Carolina Serena, Dea Garcia‐Hermoso et al. · Medical Mycology · 2015 · 324 citations · Full text
Elena De Carolis, Brunella Posteraro, Cornelia Lass‐Flörl et al. · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · 2011 · 270 citations · Full text
Life Sciences, Biology, Microbiology +14
Anna F. Lau, Steven K. Drake, Leslie B. Calhoun et al. · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · 2012 · 235 citations · Full text
Life Sciences, Biology, Microbiology +14
Simon Lévesque, Philippe J. Dufresne, Hafid Soualhine et al. · PLoS ONE · 2015 · 172 citations · Full text