Publication | Open Access
Our moral choices are foreign to us.
91
Citations
77
References
2017
Year
Ethical DilemmaMultilingualismSocial PsychologyLanguage InterferenceMoral IssuePsycholinguisticsCross-language PerspectiveMultilingual Language ProcessingPsychologySocial SciencesMoral ChoicesBilingualismForeign Language EffectLanguage StudiesSociolinguisticsCross-cultural EthicsSocial CognitionMoral PsychologyInterpersonal PragmaticCultureCross-cultural PerspectiveMoral DilemmasLanguage DiversityForeign LanguageAffect PerceptionLinguisticsCultural Psychology
Evidence shows that people are more willing to sacrifice one for five in moral dilemmas when using a foreign language than their native tongue. The study confirms the foreign‑language effect is robust across contexts and is driven mainly by increased psychological distance and reduced emotional response, with the severity of negative consequences also influencing the effect. PsycINFO database record.
Though moral intuitions and choices seem fundamental to our core being, there is surprising new evidence that people resolve moral dilemmas differently when they consider them in a foreign language (Cipolletti et al., 2016; Costa et al., 2014a; Geipel et al., 2015): People are more willing to sacrifice 1 person to save 5 when they use a foreign language compared with when they use their native tongue. Our findings show that the phenomenon is robust across various contexts and that multiple factors affect it, such as the severity of the negative consequences associated with saving the larger group. This has also allowed us to better describe the phenomenon and investigate potential explanations. Together, our results suggest that the foreign language effect is most likely attributable to an increase in psychological distance and a reduction in emotional response. (PsycINFO Database Record
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1