Neuropsychological Rehabilitation · 2017 · 10 citations · 37 references
MedicineGeriatric MedicinePsychologyDementiaGeriatric AssessmentPsychometricsCognitive AssessmentCognitive Function AssessmentCognitive ImpairmentFunctional Assessment In Older AdultsFunctional Impairment In DementiaNeuropsychological AssessmentClinical Utility AssessmentCognitive Impairment EvaluationEveryday Cognition AssessmentFunctional Cognition AssessmentGeriatric Cognitive AssessmentInternal Consistency ReliabilityMemory TestScreening Cut Scores
This study examined the use of the Hong Kong version of the Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test-Third Edition (RBMT-3) for older adults, and by presenting the optimal cut-off scores for patients with cognitive impairments, and for a group of peers who have functional everyday cognition. Hundred older adults residing in community dwellings were recruited from three non-government organisations and completed the RBMT-3: 29 patients with mild to moderate dementia, 34 persons at risk for MCI, and 37 matched older adults with everyday functional cognition for a healthy control group (NC). The test has excellent inter-rater (ICC [2, 1] = 0.997), intra-rater (ICC [3, 1] = 0), and parallel version (ICC [3, 1] = 0.990) reliabilities, as well as satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha: 0.643-0.832). The scores of the MCI group were significantly lower than those of NC group in four subtests. The optimal cut-off scaled scores of ≤ 41.5, ≤ 102.5, and ≤ 131.5 are suggested for the RBMT-3 to discriminate between patients with mild and moderate dementia, mild dementia and MCI, and MCI and NC, with sensitivities 73%, 100% and 94.1%, respectively. This version is useful to differentiate those with or without risk of cognitive impairments.
37
Ronald C. Petersen, Glenn E. Smith, Stephen C. Waring et al. · Archives of Neurology · 1999 · 9K citations
Medicine, Neurology, Psychiatry +17
New Zealand Journal of Psychology
Marc Wilson · New Zealand journal of psychology · 2019 · 2.1K citations