Clinical Dementia Rating: A Reliable and Valid Diagnostic and Staging Measure for Dementia of the Alzheimer Type

John C. Morris

International Psychogeriatrics · 1997 · 1.6K citations · 13 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Global staging measures for Alzheimer’s dementia evaluate how cognitive decline affects daily functioning and are considered the ultimate outcome for drug trials, offering clinically meaningful insights with reduced floor/ceiling bias and, despite requiring time‑consuming interviews, are widely accepted as reliable and valid assessments. The Washington University Clinical Dementia Rating uses semistructured patient and informant interviews to rate performance across six cognitive domains, thereby staging Alzheimer’s dementia severity. The CDR has been standardized across multicenter studies, shows strong interrater reliability, and its global and domain scores have demonstrated criterion validity and neuropathological confirmation of dementia status.

Abstract

Global staging measures for dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT) assess the influence of cognitive loss on the ability to conduct everyday activities and represent the "ultimate test" of efficacy for antidementia drug trials. They provide information about clinically meaningful function and behavior and are less affected by the "floor" and "ceiling" effects commonly associated with psychometric tests. The Washington University Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) is a global scale developed to clinically denote the presence of DAT and stage its severity. The clinical protocol incorporates semistructured interviews with the patient and informant to obtain information necessary to rate the subject's cognitive performance in six domains: memory, orientation, judgment and problem solving, community affairs, home and hobbies, and personal care. The CDR has been standardized for multicenter use, including the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD) and the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study, and interrater reliability has been established. Criterion validity for both the global CDR and scores on individual domains has been demonstrated, and the CDR also has been validated neuropathologically, particularly for the presence or absence of dementia. Standardized training protocols are available. Although not well suited as a brief screening tool for population surveys of dementia because the protocol depends on sufficient time to conduct interviews, the CDR has become widely accepted in the clinical setting as a reliable and valid global assessment measure for DAT.

References

13